|
|
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agropecuária Oeste; Embrapa Meio Norte / UEP-Parnaíba. |
Data corrente: |
26/11/1993 |
Data da última atualização: |
13/10/2016 |
Autoria: |
BOS, M. G.; NUGTEREN, J. |
Título: |
On irrigation efficiencies. |
Edição: |
4th ed. |
Ano de publicação: |
1990 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Wageningen: ILRI, 1990. |
Páginas: |
117 p. |
Descrição Física: |
il. |
Série: |
(ILRI. Publication, 19). |
ISBN: |
90-70260-875 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
Definition of the problem; Method of investigation applied; Data processing: Grouping of areas; definitions of efficiencies; Calculating theefficiencies; Efficiency terminology and reuse; Accuracy of the calculated efficiencies. Some results not directly related to irrigation efficiency: Field irrigation method versus irrigated area; Farm size distribution; Number of farms served by group inlets; Project staffing. Analysis and evaluation of the data from the questionaire with respect to irrigation efficiency: Conveyance efficiency; Conveyance efficiency versus average irrigable area; Conveyance efficiency versus size of rotational unit; Conveyance efficiency as a function of technical equipment; Distribution efficiency; Distribution efficiency versus farm sizeand soil type; Distribution efficiency versus duration of delivery period; Farm inlet versus group inlet; Field application efficiency; Influence of field irrigation method on field application efficiency; Effect of depth of application on e (a); Field application efficiency versus farm size and soil type; Influence of farm flow rate on applicationefficiency; Tertiary unit efficiency; Influence of flow rate at farm inlet on tertiary unit efficiency; Relation of water charges to tertiary unit efficiency; Relation of tertiary unit efficiency to method of water supply to the farm; Irrigation system efficiency; Relation of irrigation system efficiency to actually irrigated area; Influence of project management on irrigation system efficiency; Everall or project efficiency. Practical application of the study results with some examples. Evaluation of the applied approach. Conclusions and recommendations. MenosDefinition of the problem; Method of investigation applied; Data processing: Grouping of areas; definitions of efficiencies; Calculating theefficiencies; Efficiency terminology and reuse; Accuracy of the calculated efficiencies. Some results not directly related to irrigation efficiency: Field irrigation method versus irrigated area; Farm size distribution; Number of farms served by group inlets; Project staffing. Analysis and evaluation of the data from the questionaire with respect to irrigation efficiency: Conveyance efficiency; Conveyance efficiency versus average irrigable area; Conveyance efficiency versus size of rotational unit; Conveyance efficiency as a function of technical equipment; Distribution efficiency; Distribution efficiency versus farm sizeand soil type; Distribution efficiency versus duration of delivery period; Farm inlet versus group inlet; Field application efficiency; Influence of field irrigation method on field application efficiency; Effect of depth of application on e (a); Field application efficiency versus farm size and soil type; Influence of farm flow rate on applicationefficiency; Tertiary unit efficiency; Influence of flow rate at farm inlet on tertiary unit efficiency; Relation of water charges to tertiary unit efficiency; Relation of tertiary unit efficiency to method of water supply to the farm; Irrigation system efficiency; Relation of irrigation system efficiency to actually irrigated area; Influence of project management on irrigation... Mostrar Tudo |
Palavras-Chave: |
Efficiency; Eficiencia; Resultados; Results; Use; Uso. |
Thesagro: |
Irrigação. |
Thesaurus Nal: |
irrigation. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
Marc: |
LEADER 02281nam a2200265 a 4500 001 1240607 005 2016-10-13 008 1990 bl uuuu 00u1 u #d 020 $a90-70260-875 100 1 $aBOS, M. G. 245 $aOn irrigation efficiencies. 250 $a4th ed. 260 $aWageningen: ILRI$c1990 300 $a117 p.$cil. 490 $a(ILRI. Publication, 19). 520 $aDefinition of the problem; Method of investigation applied; Data processing: Grouping of areas; definitions of efficiencies; Calculating theefficiencies; Efficiency terminology and reuse; Accuracy of the calculated efficiencies. Some results not directly related to irrigation efficiency: Field irrigation method versus irrigated area; Farm size distribution; Number of farms served by group inlets; Project staffing. Analysis and evaluation of the data from the questionaire with respect to irrigation efficiency: Conveyance efficiency; Conveyance efficiency versus average irrigable area; Conveyance efficiency versus size of rotational unit; Conveyance efficiency as a function of technical equipment; Distribution efficiency; Distribution efficiency versus farm sizeand soil type; Distribution efficiency versus duration of delivery period; Farm inlet versus group inlet; Field application efficiency; Influence of field irrigation method on field application efficiency; Effect of depth of application on e (a); Field application efficiency versus farm size and soil type; Influence of farm flow rate on applicationefficiency; Tertiary unit efficiency; Influence of flow rate at farm inlet on tertiary unit efficiency; Relation of water charges to tertiary unit efficiency; Relation of tertiary unit efficiency to method of water supply to the farm; Irrigation system efficiency; Relation of irrigation system efficiency to actually irrigated area; Influence of project management on irrigation system efficiency; Everall or project efficiency. Practical application of the study results with some examples. Evaluation of the applied approach. Conclusions and recommendations. 650 $airrigation 650 $aIrrigação 653 $aEfficiency 653 $aEficiencia 653 $aResultados 653 $aResults 653 $aUse 653 $aUso 700 1 $aNUGTEREN, J.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agropecuária Oeste (CPAO) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Florestas. |
Data corrente: |
27/11/2019 |
Data da última atualização: |
10/12/2019 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
Autoria: |
KALIL FILHO, A. N.; WENDLING, I.; ROSOT, M. A. D.; LAZZAROTTO, M.; GUEDES, J. dos S. |
Afiliação: |
ANTONIO NASCIM KALIL FILHO, CNPF; IVAR WENDLING, CNPF; MARIA AUGUSTA DOETZER ROSOT, CNPF; MARCELO LAZZAROTTO, CNPF; JULIANA DOS SANTOS GUEDES, Universidade Federal do Paraná. |
Título: |
Determinação do fator de forma do cedro australiano (Toona ciliata M. Roem. var.australis (F. Muell.) Bahadur). |
Ano de publicação: |
2019 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira, Colombo, v. 39, (nesp), e201902043, 2019. p. 406. |
Idioma: |
Português |
Notas: |
Edição especial dos resumos do IUFRO World Congress, 25., 2019, Curitiba. |
Palavras-Chave: |
Fator de forma. |
Thesagro: |
Cedro Australiano; Toona Ciliata. |
Categoria do assunto: |
K Ciência Florestal e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/206725/1/57121-p406.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 00726nam a2200193 a 4500 001 2115342 005 2019-12-10 008 2019 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aKALIL FILHO, A. N. 245 $aDeterminação do fator de forma do cedro australiano (Toona ciliata M. Roem. var.australis (F. Muell.) Bahadur).$h[electronic resource] 260 $aPesquisa Florestal Brasileira, Colombo, v. 39, (nesp), e201902043, 2019. p. 406.$c2019 500 $aEdição especial dos resumos do IUFRO World Congress, 25., 2019, Curitiba. 650 $aCedro Australiano 650 $aToona Ciliata 653 $aFator de forma 700 1 $aWENDLING, I. 700 1 $aROSOT, M. A. D. 700 1 $aLAZZAROTTO, M. 700 1 $aGUEDES, J. dos S.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Florestas (CNPF) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|